Discover the magic of the internet at Imgur, a community powered entertainment destination. Lift your spirits with funny jokes, trending memes, entertaining gifs, inspiring stories, viral videos, and so much more from users like M2ThaL.
but the 8800 as much better sound than the sx-D7000,it´s a already poor receiver from the early 80´s ,so low power but do you listen to music with the volume always at full capacity ?so the sa-8800 is one of the best made by pioneer and you say you have the spec-1 and spec-2 also the sx-1250,don´t you notice any diference to the SX-D7000?i´m from a Pioneer family so i have most of the components released in the 70´s including yours and not the SX-1250 but the SX-1050 and the 78 sx-1980,also the exclusive more powerfull system from the 70´s with the twin2401exclusive speakers with the reel deck and the P3turntable ,also the 76 top of the line component system with the PLC-590 series 20 turntable and the 79 top of the line component system and bought in early 90´s a complete URUSHI system with four 8ohms prologue towers, not the Eclipse cheap components sold in the America´s with multi-players and yellow displays, and that´s only part of my pioneer components. I have a lot more and also from better brands, and i can assure you that the SA-8800 it´s far better than the SX-D7000 in sound quality and they can handle more powerfull speakers made recentelly or in the 90´s. sx-D7000?this coming from a person that as three of the best components pioneer made, you
I’m not sure what some of your comment is referencing. Neither I nor anyone else in this particular thread mentioned spec components or SX-1250 or the like. And as to the SX-D7000 being low power, I think it’s rated at 120 watts per channel which is more than my SA-8800. I wasn’t unhappy with the SC-d7000. I think I am enjoying the SA-8800 more so far.
but the 8800 as much better sound than the sx-D7000,it´s a already poor receiver from the early 80´s ,so low power but do you listen to music with the volume always at full capacity ?so the sa-8800 is one of the best made by pioneer and you say you have the spec-1 and spec-2 also the sx-1250,don´t you notice any diference to the SX-D7000?i´m from a Pioneer family so i have most of the components released in the 70´s including yours and not the SX-1250 but the SX-1050 and the 78 sx-1980,also the exclusive more powerfull system from the 70´s with the twin2401exclusive speakers with the reel deck and the P3turntable ,also the 76 top of the line component system with the PLC-590 series 20 turntable and the 79 top of the line component system and bought in early 90´s a complete URUSHI system with four 8ohms prologue towers, not the Eclipse cheap components sold in the America´s with multi-players and yellow displays, and that´s only part of my pioneer components. I have a lot more and also from better brands, and i can assure you that the SA-8800 it´s far better than the SX-D7000 in sound quality and they can handle more powerfull speakers made recentelly or in the 90´s. sx-D7000?this coming from a person that as three of the best components pioneer made, you
I’m not sure what some of your comment is referencing. Neither I nor anyone else in this particular thread mentioned spec components or SX-1250 or the like. And as to the SX-D7000 being low power, I think it’s rated at 120 watts per channel which is more than my SA-8800. I wasn’t unhappy with the SC-d7000. I think I am enjoying the SA-8800 more so far.