I’ve owned my pair of MDR-V6s for 4 years now, and I absolutely adore them. They were my entry into headphone collecting and headphone repair. They sound amazing, everything is crystal clear.

I’ve tried a lot of headphones as well. Things like MDR-V600, V700, V900/HD, SHP9600, Superlux HD681, Grado SR60, ATH-M50X. And now I’ve tried HD 599s and HD 6XXs… And my V6s STILL sound better than all of them. That can’t be right.

Nicer and nicer headphones close the gap, but nothing does it like my 7506s and my V6s. Some have bass that sounds as good, some have mids that sound as good, some have top end that sounds as good… nothing has the whole package.

I’m just so confused… each time I go into a pair of headphones finally expecting to have something that makes me say “wow, this is better than the MDR-V6.” And then I go back to V6s, and they sound better.

  • Bingturong@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    V6 is already one hell of a good headphone. A lot of the headphones you mentioned have a very different sound signature to them except maybe the V900HD. I can definitely recommend the CD900ST as an upgrade to them.

    If you don’t mind older headphones, the SA3000/5000 as well to my ears is CD900ST on cocaine and still remains one of my all time favourites.

    If you don’t mind EVEN older headphones, the original CD900 might catch your attention. They’re the father more or less of the V6.

    For more current offerings, the CD900ST as mentioned, you might also be interested in the audio technica equivalent of the SX1a which is also terrific.

    Of some I haven’t really heard, there’s the M1ST and Victor HA-MX100.

    If you really want the ultimate however, any of the Stax Lambdas, even the vintage models, as well as the vintage SR-X mk III are similar to the V6 in tonality

    • Avery1003@alien.topOPB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s a ton of models! Very insightful comment. CD900s amd CD900STs are on the list to get. But I will look into some of these models as well! Ohh someday I will be worthy of owning stax

  • MakeshiftApe@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    To be honest unless I’m missing something (I’m less familiar with the other models in the MDR series you listed), that entire list is side-grades or down-grades*, so I’m not particularly surprised you still like them best.

    (*By down-grades I don’t mean objectively worse in every sense, I mean a headphone that falls into a lower performance tier than yours, and by side-grades I mean headphones that fall into a similar performance tier)

    Even when you upgrade to a higher performance tier with headphones there’s often trade-offs.

    Since just about every other variable of headphone qualities can eventually be summed to frequency response at the ear canal, that means it doesn’t matter if you’re improving the bass, fixing weird treble, making a headphone sound “faster” or more detailed, you are at the end of the day ending up with anywhere from a slightly different, to very different final frequency response. That in turn reflects back onto all those other individual variables: That improved bass might mean maybe those mids don’t cut through the mix quite so nicely as before. That “fast and tight” bass might mean the overall quantity of bass is a bit lower. That increased detail, might mean a brighter and more fatiguing signature that isn’t as easy listening to for long hours.

    So almost every switch from one headphone to another, even when jumping up price changes means “You get this, but…” and it’s just a question of finding a “but” that doesn’t bother you. Sometimes the “but” is a pure improvement, like the tuning being radically different but sounding better in every way, but you won’t find two headphones that are identical carbon copies of each other with one simply being identical but better, there’s always going to be something different about the sound and that often means some kind of trade-off.

    It actually feels really special when you do find a pair of headphones that’s just an overall improvement in all the areas you liked the original pair for, rather than an upgrade in 2/3 and a down-grade in the other 1/3.

  • wine-o-saur@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s perfectly normal to prefer the sound of headphones you’ve used for a long time.

    Also V6s are very capable in terms of plain ol sound reproduction so until you get into cork sniffy bits like height and air and slam etc there’s nothing that should be outright lacking from the experience you get from them.

    End of the day they are excellent headphones with a tuning you enjoy. You may find higher end headphones which improve certain aspects of the sound while maintaining a similar tuning, and perhaps improving on other aspects like comfort etc, but you will end up comparing a time-worn utilitarian studio tool to luxury items aimed at irrational hobbyists, so prepare for a big price jump.

  • V20FRILL@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve had mine since 1989.

    Just replaced the pads with some elites. I agree with You. All these years I’ve enjoyed them through different sources and I have to say they only sound better as the years go by. They are just So Honest. No EQ necessary, but sometimes I do just to remind Myself of that.

    If I did try something new it would probably be something in the Plannar realm.

  • Haddedam@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You can see if you can try the cd900st which are japan equvilents for their audio production.

    I really miss my V6’s. Shame they discontinued it in favor of that ear piercing headache set meant for audio recording.