i completely get preferring analog media, so if it’s about the sound characteristics (that ‘warmth’), having physical media, etc fair enough. but if the goal of an audiophile is to get the highest quality reproduction of a recording wouldn’t CDs or FLACs be your best bet?

maybe this only really applies for newer music, perhaps digital releases for music recorded analogue are just digitized vinyl or reel to reel recordings but for music produced in DAWs the highest quality version available for that release would surely be either a CD or a digital FLAC release

  • solidtitanium@alien.topBEnglish
    1·
    10 months ago

    Vinyl has superior frequency response to CD. Also a digital wave can never equal an analog sound wave. Plus there is something nice about taking more time enjoying cueing up a record rather than skipping tracks and what not that happens digitally. About the only better thing with digital is ease of use and lower wow and flutter.

    • tomii-dev@alien.topOPBEnglish
      1·
      10 months ago

      i dont think this is true… with digital audio you typically have a sample rate of 44.1KHz which is faster than a cutting machine can create variations in the lacquer. sure a digital wave can never equal an analog sound wave but its closer to the original soundwave than the analogue representation of it on the record

      • solidtitanium@alien.topBEnglish
        1·
        10 months ago

        That is fine, but it is not a myth or it would not require a DAC which makes it into a sine wave from basically garbage 0 and ones.

        • audioen@alien.topBEnglish
          1·
          10 months ago

          Well, there exists formats like SACD that technically have no DAC, in a manner of speaking. The “garbage” 0s and 1s there run at such a high sample rate that they average out to the correct signal with a tiny bit of low-pass filtering. This guy is the god of explaining precisely and correctly how digital audio works, Monty from Xiph: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIQ9IXSUzuM