Looking for a solid headphone to run with a Fiio K5 or K7 this Black Friday. I’ve never experienced Hifi before.

Here’s what I need:

-Instrument separation and high resolution -Good Imaging for occasional FPS -Extremely deep bass extension for car and flight simulators (I absolutely love the low roar of vehicle engines). I’m talking single digit Hz lol -Below 500

  • TransducerBot@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This submission has automatically been removed due to the following rule:

    Rule 2: Ask purchase and shopping questions in the Shopping, Setup, and Technical Help Desk

    Requests for product opinions, comparisons, and general purchase advice must be made in the dedicated Shopping, Setup, and Technical Help Desk instead of a new post.

    Portable audio related purchase advice may also be asked in r/HeadphoneAdvice but please familiarize yourself with their rules first.

    What questions are considered purchase advice?

    • A request for product suggestions, comparison requests, or opinion requests fall under the purchase advice rule. These can often be found by searching first.

    • Any suggestion or comparison request pertaining to headphones, IEMs, DACs, amps, or other accessories should be directed to the purchase help thread or r/headphoneadvice.

    • Asking the subreddit to help make a decision to buy a product does fall under this rule (e.g. “should I get dekoni pads for my HD650?”).

    Why does this rule even exist?

  • Chastity23@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The DT-1990, from my experience with it in gaming, is that it images really well with HRTF audio. As for your other need, deep bass extension, is where the 1990 will not deliver. It has good mid-bass, but not much in subbass, even with leather pads.

    You may want to consider this item instead:

    Hmm, I was going to suggest the Monoprice M1070 planars for $223 with current coupon, but they are OOS as of today. So are the AMT’s.

    You can also consider the Kennerton Magni. They use graphene dynamic drivers and deliver some good bass.

  • libeako@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Out of the list you gave: i would choose the PC38X. Good sound quality all around, comfy, mic, volume control, cheap. What more would you need? You should look on the others only if you happen to end up not liking the 38X.

      • libeako@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It has about the same resolution, in my opinion, as HD 600, DT 1990, when all are equalized.

        When not equalized then the clarity of the 38 will be somewhat lower. But that should not frighten you. Its lack of clarity is not because of technical weakness but because of the frequency response tuning. It is intentionally tuned so. Which one may like or not. It is subjective. The tuning of the 1990 tuning is much worse IMO, i can not even listen to it without equalization. The 38 can be used without equalization. 660 tuning is perhaps clearer, but not by much and even that slight difference you may either even like more or eliminate with software equalization to get a perfect tuning.

        It is difficult for me to understand why other people prefer the more expensive ones. Most audiophiles do not even try headphones which has “gaming” label. These decisions are somewhat based on fashion or personal preference for a certain sound. Some people exclude cheap products because they assume that cheaper is probably worse. Some products are hyped and that makes people buy them and then expectation bias makes them think that it is good.

        • NoPunIntended44@alien.topOPB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I do EQ the 38X to Oratory’s preset.

          I just can’t believe what I’m hearing. People buy 700 dollar headphones over 150 ones just for the tuning? I’m pretty new to this rabbit hole of a hobby so I guess I have no idea.

          Higher Ohms or less sensitivity to me means “more” driver coils. There has to be a difference in resolution somehow. Or correct me if I’m wrong lol.

          • libeako@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sometimes diff in the technical [independent of tuning] resolution does exist. But that usually does not depend on the price. My most resolving headphone so far is on my head right now, it is a 40 USD Superlux 672. It is more resolving [to my hearing] than HD 600, DT 1990. Perhaps resolution is subjective, i do not know for sure.

            In my opinion technical resolution comes not from voice coil or membrane being thin but by the sound being clean of problems like texture and lingering - the less fake stuff we here - the more true stuff we here.

  • meato1@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    1990 had the sharpest imaging I’ve ever heard. The center image is so sharp and definite. The treble is pronounced but never bothered me ymmv. Separation and resolving ability were good, no veil at all. To me the bass was quite strong, but honestly none of the headphones you’re looking at will have super thick bass without EQ.