I’m comparing these to my my old Sony WH-1000XM4 which I bought for the noise cancellation; They do sound clearer/better in the mids or just overall, I don’t have any negative to say about the sound per se. I’d like more bass though, and personally I like closed ones so I feel more isolated from the world.

But my point here is that honestly 600 dollars for this is already going into snake oil territory for me. They don’t sound that different. And the materials and construction is fucking simple, it’s plastic, foam, synthetic pads/polyester(?), very basic stuff. I could see these being sold for 30 bucks from china. And this is not a dig at these headphones specifically.

I’m very specific about image quality. Audio quality I can’t feel the same way about, it is somehow half snake oil and half legit quality differences. I think what it boils down to is people make too much of a fuss about tiny audio differences.

  • Antiwhippy@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Snake oil assumes that it’s trying to sell you something else other than what’s advertised.

  • Chatt_a_Vegas@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    You are super generalizing here.

    1. You say you prefer closed backs and bass.
    2. You say the 660S2 sound clearer and better in the mids and better “just overall”.
    3. You say you’re “very specific about image quality” as a con for the 660S2 after saying that they are “clearer/better in the mids or just overall” (suggesting better imaging) while stating that you prefer to feel “isolated from the world” (while closed backs are known to have less accurate staging on average)…

    So many contradictions. I’m confused? If you don’t like them that’s that. But your explanation counters your conclusion.

  • chipmunkman@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    How long have you had the Sennheisers for? It takes time to get used to the new sound signature and the pick out the differences in the songs you listen to. Also maybe they don’t have the right type of sound signature for your preference. And its possible you don’t have an ear for picking out the differences in the music or the differences don’t really matter to you.

    For the record, I think I mainly fall into that last camp. For the most part, I can enjoy most songs even with different sound signatures and I don’t usually listen to music critically, so small details don’t matter as much to me. You might be in the same camp as me, which would mean you would probably be satisfied with a decent quality headphone in the sub $200 range. If you’re looking for a wired closed back, I’d recommend something like the AKG K371.

    While there is a decent amount of snake oil in this hobby/industry, I certainly wouldn’t call the HD 660S2 snake oil. There’s a lot of factors as to why you might not prefer a headphone even if it is expensive, diminishing returns being a big one. Either give the Sennheisers some more time to get used to them or return them for something less expensive like the AKG K371.

  • SharingDickPix2Asker@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    To me, this post sounds like you got a product that universally matches widely existing documentation about them, and you are disappointed and saying you got something that didn’t match your expectations.

    A higher price tag does not mean “what I already have, but better”, especially if it is trying to do something completely different.

    It is fine to be disappointed or underwhelmed with a product. But I think doing proper research into finding the product that matches your preferred sound will serve you better than picking a product based on other people’s preference.

    Return them and get something else for your money - or spend some time learning to appreciate a different aspect or approach to music than you had before. Up to yo.

  • Appropriate-Eyes@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago
    1. The 660S is not the best value headphone in the first place
    2. If you can barely tell a difference between the absurdly bloated WH 1000 XM4 and the bass rolled off 660S2 then don’t go too deep into the hobby to begin with.
  • Bewgnish@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    General Snake Oil went for the Sennheiser HD660S2 expecting glory but got owned apparently. You went for the luxurious side grade of the cheaper mainstays wanting better image quality (as in imaging for gaming, I assume?) but ended up disappointed? Dunno what $30 over-ear Chi-fi headphones you’re comparing them to but please let us all know!

  • hatlad43@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    And the materials and construction is fucking simple, it’s plastic, foam, synthetic pads/polyester(?), very basic stuff. I could see these being sold for 30 bucks from china

    Right right, materials can be cheap. But have you consider the research & development behind it?