I have yet to find one that really stands out. What would you pick if you could only decide on one album? I’ve heard the Brothers in Arms SACD is a must own

  • Partha4us@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I thoroughly enjoy Karl Bohm’s version of Mozart clarinet concert on SACD : it is SO fluid and blooming, so f€&@%n mellifluous. Also Ali Akbar Khan’s Indian architexture on water lily records SACD. Got most of Coltrane on UHHQCD MQA: sounds so much more real and emotive: best version up until now: almost analog. Same relaxed sound as SACD. After this you can’t listen to those horrible pcm’s anymore.

    • whiteajah365@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      SACDs are technically better than red books but with a good recording I hear little difference. I have a fairly transparent system. I recently purchased DGs Beethoven new complete set, many of the recordings are out of this world, I own SACDs of some of the identical albums, my wife and I A/B tested and we picked the red books more than the SACDs. Now take multi channel (which I have a system for and enjoy) and it’s an entirely different conversation.

      • Partha4us@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s interesting…I guess better mastering could be a factor or perhaps better DA converting for red book. Are the SACD’s DSD? I find SACD that are still based on pcm mastering inferior to dsd mastering:

        “DSD uses delta-sigma modulation a form of pulse-density modulation encoding, a technique to represent audio signals in digital format, a sequence of single-bit values at a sampling rate of 2.8224 MHz. This is 64 times the CD audio sampling rate of 44.1 kHz, but with 1-bit samples instead of 16-bit samples.”

        …that’s a big difference…