I have been trying to gain some understanding into 2 Way vs. 3 Way Speakers. I have read lots of information that talk about the technical difference, and that makes sense. What is hard to find is insight into the differences/advantages in the actual sound.

For those of you that have experience with both, are there notable distinctions in the sound performance between two way and three way speakers?

    • Tough-Jeweler2755@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Usually it is a function of how many crossover stages, not the number of transducers. A three-way speaker should have two crossover networks which in a passive speaker splits the signal between bass and mid frequencies and between mid and high frequencies.

      These days many speakers in the professional world are active, in that they have built-in amplifiers that incorporate electronic crossovers and (eg) two or three amplifier stages to match the three frequency bands. This enables the designers to match the amplifier stages and crossover characteristics to the transducers employed for optimum performance across the entire frequency spectrum. Check out ADAM Audio speakers as used by professional recording engineers and musicians in their personal studios.

      To fully answer your question the number of transducers does not define whether a speaker is two way or three way (four way is unusual unless a separate sub-woofer is added to a three way system).

    • mkaszycki81@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dali, Focal, KEF, and I’m sure plenty other brands make 4-way speakers. They’re typically made by taking a 3-way speaker and adding a subwoofer (like Focal does in Grande Utopia which has 6½ inch midrange, 11 inch midwoofer and a stonking big 16 inch sub), or an ultrasonic tweeter (like Dali does, but they call them 3½-way, also Sony and KEF).

      I guess you can make a 5-way by adding both.